SNDAs Making It Harder
should raise significant SNDA issues with the operator
and/or the lender before its escrow deposit becomes
non-refundable.
Proactive Purchaser. The lender and operator have
competing demands. In particular, the operator wants
security of tenure following a loan default and flexibility to
operate the hotel in a distressed situation without undue
lender interference, and the lender wants maximum
flexibility to direct hotel cash flow and operations in a
distressed or default scenario. These competing demands
can spark heated debate on various issues. A purchaser
should, therefore, discuss SNDA requirements with its
lender during the term sheet stage for the financing and
broach potential sticking points with the operator as early
as possible. Ultimately, the purchaser is well advised to
actually bring together the lender and hotel operator early
in the transaction.
Control Over Cash. In the current cycle, many lenders
have been frustrated by an inability to control hotel cash
flow or even implement operating expense reductions in a
default scenario. Accordingly, a lender making a new loan
likely will seek control of the hotel’s bank accounts following
a loan default and demand greater control over capital and
other expenditures. The operator probably will resist these
demands as the current cycle has reinforced its need to
control hotel cash to ensure continued operations that
meet its brand standards. The purchaser also should resist
these lender requests as they will limit the purchaser’s
rights vis-à-vis the operator and may reduce its ability to
work out compromises with the operator when there are
cash shortfalls.
Lender/Operator Relationship. Operators sometimes
have found themselves without a line of communication
to the lender and excluded from workout discussions
between the lender and owner that resulted in deals
affecting hotel operations. To address these concerns, an
operator may seek a clear right to communicate directly
with the lender and a reciprocal commitment from the
lender to communicate with the operator in a default
scenario. Similarly, the operator may
require that the SNDA authorize it to
follow the lender’s instructions in the
event of either an absentee owner or
conflicting instructions from the owner and
lender. A purchaser must carefully negotiate
the scope of the operator’s rights to
communicate with the lender and to follow
the lender’s instructions because both may
provide the lender with greater control at
the expense of the purchaser.
Purchaser in the Middle
The ongoing stress in the hotel
operating environment has resulted in
renewed and intense interest in the
terms of SNDAs for management
agreements. This reality ensures that SNDAs
will be hotly negotiated, and the various
stakeholders should not rely on prior
notions of “industry standard” terms. The
potential purchaser of a distressed hotel –
as the potential borrower under the
loan and the potential owner under
the hotel management agreement –
must mediate the lender’s and hotel
operator’s competing demands,
ensure the SNDA negotiations
commence early in the deal
process, and remain actively
involved the negotiations. ■
Teresa K. Goebel is counsel in the San Francisco office of
Goodwin Procter and can be reached at (415) 733-6052 or
tgoebel@goodwinprocter.com.
Matthew G. Pohlman is counsel in the London office of
Goodwin Procter and can be reached at (+ 44) 20 7447 4212
or mpohlman@goodwinprocter.com.